Metropolitan Police Department: 5.19.05, p1 - Electronic Recording
DC Home Mayor DC Guide Residents Business Visitors DC Government Kids

Metropolitan Police Department


Jan
Feb Mar
Apr
May
Jun Jul Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov 
Dec
 
2005 Statements
Feb Mar Apr
May Jun Jul Aug
Sep Oct  Nov  Dec

2004 Statements
Jan Feb Mar Apr
May  Jun Jul Aug
Sep Oct Nov Dec

2003 Statements
Jan Feb Mar Apr
May Jun Jul Aug
Sep Oct Nov Dec

2002 Statements
Jan Feb Mar Apr
May Jun Jul Aug
Sep Oct Nov Dec

2001 Statements
Jan Feb Mar Apr
May Jun Jul Aug
Sep Oct Nov Dec

2000 Statements
Jan Feb Mar Apr
May Jun Jul Aug
Sep Oct Nov Dec

1999 Statements
Jan Feb Mar Apr
May Jun Jul Aug
Sep Oct Nov Dec

1998 Statements
Jan Feb Mar Apr
May Jun Jul Aug
Sep Oct Nov Dec

News Room

May 19, 2005

Public Hearing on “Electronic Recording Procedures and Penalties Act of 2005,” Bill 16-138

Charles H. Ramsey
Chief of Police
Metropolitan Police Department

Chief Charles H. Ramsey delivered the following statement to the Council of the District of Columbia, Committee on the Judiciary, The Honorable Phil Mendelson, Chair, on May 19, 2005, at the Council Chamber, John A. Wilson Building, 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC.

  • Download* a printable version of the testimony
Chairman Mendelson, members of the Committee, staff and guests … I appreciate the opportunity to update the Committee on the Metropolitan Police Department’s implementation of the District’s law on the electronic recording of custodial interrogations, and to offer comment on the new legislation now before the Committee, the “Electronic Recording Procedures and Penalties Act of 2005.” The text of my prepared remarks can be found on the MPD website: www.mpdc.dc.gov.
 
Let me begin by stating that the Metropolitan Police Department generally supports the “Electronic Recording Procedures and Penalties Act of 2005 ” because it would provide for one clear set of standards governing electronic recording of custodial interrogations. At the same time, the proposed legislation would remove some provisions of the Electronic Recording Procedures Act of 2004 that our Department has opposed on policy and operational grounds.
 
Specifically, the 2004 law creates an evidentiary presumption that certain statements, if not electronically recorded, are involuntary. This presumption would apply regardless of the reason the statement was not recorded -- whether due to equipment failure, inadvertent operator error, etc. 
 
Our Department supports the electronic recording of custodial interrogations. And we support it not simply because electronic recording is the law in the District of Columbia. We support electronic recording because it is good, sound public policy that helps to protect the interests of both the MPD and the individuals being interrogated.
 
Electronic recording of interrogations has emerged as a “best practice” in the field of law enforcement, and our Department is committed to setting the standard for police policies and practices in the area of criminal investigations.
 
Page 1 of 3      1  2  3   Go To Next Page

* This document is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF) and a PDF reader is required for viewing. Download a PDF reader or learn more about PDFs.